We're Moving

 

 

Adelaide parking levy faces stiff opposition

Posted by admin pci,Wednesday, May 08, 2013

CBD parking levies are still a hot topic of discussion around Australia following last week’s blog reporting on the Victorian government’s plans for an increased parking tax.

This week has seen South Australia’s Opposition ramping up its fight against their state government’s planned parking levy for Adelaide’s CBD. The controversial plan is fast becoming a key election issue ahead of the March 2014 vote.

As we reported on Wayfinding Forum in March, several influential industry groups have attacked the plan as a slug on locals and businesses. The levy, purportedly a $52m injection for ‘transport development’ projects over two years, will be charged at $750 per space and most likely affect property owners who are sure to pass on the increase to their customers.

The opposition leader Steven Marshall has gone to the extraordinary length of releasing a television commercial almost a year out from the election slamming the plan and vowing to scrap the tax should he win government. View ad here:


Mr Marshall said, "At a time when cost of living pressures are rapidly rising, the Labor Government is reaching into the pocket of South Australians to repay the debt."

The Property Council has welcomed the opposition's promise, which it said recognised the concerns of city’s retailers. The PCA has since released a survey showing the levy could scare off “almost 60 per cent of motorists” from the CBD.

A good result for congestion says the SA Premier, but at what cost? At PTC we conducted some research as to how the parking levy revenues in NSW and VIC had been spent and what correlation could be found to prove or disprove its impact on congestion. Sadly neither question was able to be answered satisfactorily.


Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________


Car parking levy in Melbourne on the rise

Posted by admin pci,Wednesday, May 01, 2013


An increased parking levy is set to be included in Victoria’s state budget next Tuesday. The Age reports that property owners are currently charged $950 annual per long term (all day) parking space, however this will rise to $1300 p.a and will be extended to include short term parking as well. The levy will now cover up to 60,000 CBD car spaces.

Victorian Treasurer Michael O'Brien says the additional revenue collected (amounting to around $44m) would be dedicated to public transport and road projects. This will be interesting to see as we have not been able to obtain details specific activities funded by the levy in prior years.

The government has spun this announcement as “less than a dollar a day” increase, but in reality it represents a 37% hike, which owners claim will be passed on directly to the consumer.

The $1300 per year is well short of the $2160 charged to businesses in Sydney, an amount that was effectively doubled by former NSW Premier Nathan Rees in 2010. As we have previously reported a parking levy is also on the cards for property owners in South Australia, effectively leaving Queensland and Tasmania as the only states that do not charge a parking levy.

Car parking levies in CBDs are touted by governments as a congestion controlling measure, however cynics say it is a pure and simple tax grab.

Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________


Transit Oriented Development needs to be more than transit and development

Posted by admin pci,Wednesday, April 03, 2013


Transit Oriented Development (TOD) is not a new concept in urban planning.

DNAinfo.com has published a story about the latest mixed development taking advantage of local public transport hubs in Chicago. The Wicker Park building contains 99 residential units but only 15 car spaces, supposedly reserved for visitors only. Whilst ratios vary around the world, a requirement of 2 car spaces per dwelling is not uncommon.

However the trend towards residential and commercial development with minimal parking is also becoming more common. Curbed Chicago lists another six examples in that city.

So, whilst TODs would appear to be helping the fight against congestion and pollution in major cities, it is also becoming clear that if executed poorly, these developments can fail spectacularly.

Australia’s Tourism & Transport Forum (TTF) lauds the benefits of TODs but warns that “coordinated planning and delivery arrangements are essential to ensure transport not only responds to past and present use patterns but is an active contributor to the shaping of the urban form.”

An example of what Kaid Benfield has called an ‘epic fail’ of urban design can be seen in his article written for The Atlantic Cities about a TOD near Miami. The author says, “there’s lots of development around, just not near the station, unless you consider parking lots and garages to be development.” He continues to emphasise his point by stating, “The station is oriented to cars, not people.” If you need another example of a TOD’s failure to orient people with the transit they require, take a look at this article written about a development in St Louis.

But how do we ensure the goals of TODs are met? TTF tells us the answer lies in a working partnership between the government and the private sector. We can only agree and hope that such cooperation becomes reality.


Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________


CBD parking tax win for New Zealand businesses

Posted by admin pci,Thursday, March 21, 2013


New Zealand PM, Mr John Key

Meanwhile in New Zealand, business organisations and unions have claimed victory after the Prime Minister backed away from a government proposal to introduce a fringe benefit tax on car parks provided to employees as part of their remuneration.

The tax on inner-city car parks in Auckland and Wellington drew concentrated criticism from a well organised lobby group comprising employer groups, advertising agencies, car parking companies and the Unite union.

Their claim was that the tax would have a negative impact on business while raising a relatively small amount of revenue, coming at a time when all business is struggling with a flat economy.

While government Ministers didn't agree with the methodology of their opponents’ cost-benefit analysis, they conceded that compliance costs made it sensible not to proceed with the proposal. However Prime Minister Key is playing down the u-turn, saying the Government always intended to "test the boundaries" of the proposal.


Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________


Compact automated parking garage launched in LA

Posted by admin pci,Tuesday, March 12, 2013


AutoParkiT has just been launched in the Van Nuys district of Los Angeles. The system is designed to automatically park, store and retrieve vehicles in a compact parking structure, using Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology containing details of the user to ensure the swift identification and retrieval of vehicles.

Whilst automated mechanical parking is not new, this particular system (according to the manufacturer) is said to be more compact than others requiring a smaller footprint, therefore reducing construction costs for developers. Refining this technology will also benefit operators allowing a greater area for the primary land use (ie retail, commercial, education or residential) which should excite investors.

As with all other similar systems, automated car parks are environmentally friendly; with the car’s engine being switched off during the process and elimination of time usually taken by motorists driving around looking for parking, emissions are lessened; furthermore, energy savings are significant as a result of lighting not being required in the storage area.

Although this has been rolled out in a residential district of the city, AutoParkiT has been designed as a scalable system suitable for shopping malls, office parks, college campuses or any place where high-density parking is required. The key factor with these systems is the comparative cost of the construction and on-going maintenance of the system against traditional car parks once the improved efficiencies in terms of space utilization are taken into account.

 

The New York Times is now reporting on the next generation of this technology being planned for apartment buildings, where cars and their owners are whisked by elevator up to the owner's condo. The first such development in Miama is due to be finished by early 2016.
Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________


Car park design – an interesting beast

Posted by admin pci,Wednesday, February 20, 2013


In any development, there is a fine line between the interests of the engineer, the developer, the investor and the end user. Ultimately all are after a solution which works, but it can be the age-old battle between cost and benefit which dictates terms.

In a previous post entitled Why Simple Design is Often Complex George Burton writes of simple measures when planning user-friendly, profitable car parks. Those ingredients relate to convenience, layout, safety/security as well as aesthetics. It is a delicate balance. His premise is that retrofitting ill-planned infrastructure is far less desirable (in many cases unachievable), compared to implementing a best practice attitude during the design process.

In an opinion piece (below) prepared by Andrew Morse Senior Traffic Engineer and Partner at PTC, Andrew explains this may cost more at the outset, but (and George Burton agrees), this “pales into insignificance” given the alternative outcomes.

It's not bad news, it’s good design


Car park design is an interesting beast, when comparing the desired outcome (a usable, inviting and safe place to leave your car while you go and do something else) with the design input process.  There is generally always a tension between these two aspects, which can be said for many components of a building/development.

It can be a difficult balance to achieve.  The input side of the scales requires money saving solutions which generally translates to 'smaller' and 'tighter' the other aspects of the building (cores, services, fire escapes etc) must be squeezed in, the land size is almost always a constraint and then Council slaps a setback around the whole site.

Typically most elements of a building’s design can be accommodated, albeit not achieving the optimum solution.  Services can wind around cores, structures can transfer to allow columns to be shifted around, ducting can employ a variety of sizes to fit through tight spots and maintain height clearances.  All of these things exist without interaction by the users of the building, so while an optimum solution is not achieved, as long it all works and achieves minimum compliance, c’est la vie….

This is where parking differs. Residents, office workers, and importantly, customers all not only have to interact with the car park but are doing so in an expensive object.  This is where designers, developers and builders should focus efforts on achieving best practice rather than substandard or minimum compliant car park arrangements.  Of course, it is recognised that the best solution is sometimes the most expensive in the short-term; however these costs pale into insignificance if a shopping centre fails commercially and operationally because of a poor car park experience,  a tenant taking legal action over an unusable parking space or (worst case scenario) someone gets injured.

Typically, the news that something doesn't fit or work or comply during the design process is met with long faces; however, this reaction forgets the output side of the project.  Sure, go ahead, achieve the input side of the scale, but if this is at the cost of a good output, the development is destined for long term problems which are expensive, if not impossible to fix.

This is where "it's not bad news, it's good design" fits in.  I have been involved in numerous developments both on the design side and the output side where issues need resolution, and two things always jump out when resolving issues.  Firstly, retrofit solutions are never as good as a designed in solution; excessive signage required to mitigate design shortcomings is a clear indicator of a bad output.



If you’re interested in attracting customers, the same applies to customer perception.



An endless loop, designed into the development to avoid bad news (and possibly cost) during the input stage.  Replace ‘Poor Design’ with ‘Good Design’ and the cycle doesn't exist, or better still it exists in the positive state.



So, when consultants push their design ideas, it's generally not bad news, just good design.

Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________


Car parking fee slashed to encourage investment

Posted by admin pci,Friday, February 15, 2013

Port Adelaide Einfield Council has voted to reduce the penalty on new developments to encourage commercial investment.

Under current regulations, in lieu of providing their quota of car parks required for new proposals, developers may choose to make a financial contribution to the Port Adelaide Centre Car Parking fund. According to AdelaideNow.com.au, revenue raised by this fund goes towards upgrading or building new car parks in the area.

As it stands, developers must pay $7200 for every carpark they are short of their quota, however under the new plan this will be slashed to $720. More information on the council's car parking fund can be found on the City of Port Adelaide Enfield site here.

Councillor Bruce Johansen, who moved the motion to lower the charge, said the previous fee was too expensive, and deterred business owners from coming to the Port.

Initially the policy was implemented to penalise businesses who did not adequately cover their parking requirements, but it has had the unintended impact of frightening away small business owners, who are evidently taking their investment elsewhere.

Not all city officials agree with the move, with city council CEO Harry Weirda saying that the fund was a good instrument to help encourage or deter development, but at $720 the impact would be watered down. Cr Johansen disagrees with Mr Weirda saying each proposal should stand on its own merits.



Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________


Update on Hong Kong parking prices

Posted by admin pci,Wednesday, January 23, 2013

In November, we reported that the cost of property prices for car parks in Hong Kong was going through the roof, following the introduction of measures from the government to cool the cost of property prices.

Car parking spaces are now selling for more than some homes, with AU$276,000 being paid for a space in November; another sold for US$385,000 in March. According to the Sydney Morning Herald, two spaces in the commercial district were recently offered $US640,000 per space.

Home prices have nearly doubled since early 2009, driven largely by wealthy buyers from mainland China. A typical 55-square-metre apartment now costs about $US577,000, with prices soaring into the millions in parts of Hong Kong Island, the city's commercial and financial centre.

Last year the government introduced curbs aimed at property speculators. Starting in late October, a 15 per cent stamp duty was levied on sales to non-permanent Hong Kong residents. A tax of 20 per cent was imposed on properties resold within six months of purchase, according to the LA Times

The result was that investors channelled their money into parking spaces, where the new rules did not apply. Parking space transactions in November rose more than five-fold compared with a year earlier, said Centaline, one of the largest real estate firms in Hong Kong. The average price of each space sold was $US92,307, up 20 per cent from a year earlier.



Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________


Sydney Convention centre to be upgraded

Posted by admin pci,Wednesday, January 16, 2013

The NSW Premier Barry O’Farrell announced last month plans to refurbish the convention, exhibition and entertainment precinct in Darling Harbour.

The upgrade will see the area boast Australia’s largest convention and exhibition facilities, Sydney’s largest red carpet entertainment venue and a hotel complex of up to 900 rooms. A new urban neighbourhood in Haymarket will be part of one of the most exciting urban renewal projects the city has ever seen, according to a press release from NSW Government.

The preferred bidder is a consortium called Destination Sydney, comprising AEG Ogden, Lend Lease, Capella Capital and Spotless. The facilities and the upgrade of the public domain at Darling Harbour will cost about $1 billion.

The existing car parks on the western side of Darling Harbour will be demolished to make way for the urban neighbourhood, home to high-tech businesses, apartments, student accommodation, shops, cafes and restaurants.

A video fly-over of the new development is available below, and for more information you can read the NSW Premier’s press release here, or the Business Events Sydney website here




Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________


UK parking in the success of urban centres

Posted by admin pci,Wednesday, January 09, 2013

“The Means” is a report published for a group of London councils, examining the relationship and relevance of parking in ‘successful’ urban centres. The study involved looking at the evidence from reports prepared by foundations, industry associations and public agencies, such as Transport for London. A questionnaire was sent out to all London boroughs, requesting data on parking supply, charging and town centre economic indicators, such as footfall (number of visitors), empty retail units, business turnover and the rate of change in businesses in two town centre areas. Data from market research carried out with shoppers at 3 outer London based shopping centres was also analysed.

Key findings of the report include:

  • More parking does not necessarily mean greater commercial success. A well managed parking scheme, where spaces ‘turn over’ frequently can help to increase the number of visitors coming to a town centre and thereby help business.
  • There is no such thing as ‘free’ parking. The costs of developing and maintaining parking spaces and then enforcing proper use to ensure good traffic flow have to be borne by somebody. In the case of local authority operated parking (on street or off street) any costs that are not covered by parking revenue falls to local Council Tax payers.
  • Shopkeepers consistently overestimate the share of their customers arriving by car. In some cases, this is by a factor of as much as 400%. In London, as well as other cities, the share of those accessing urban centres on foot or by public transport is much greater. Walking is the most important mode for accessing local town centres; public transport is the most important mode for travel to international centres, such as Oxford Street.
  • Whilst car drivers spend more on a single trip, walkers and bus users spend more over a week or a month. In 2011, pedestrians in London town centres spent £147 more per month than those travelling by car. Compared with 2004, spending by public transport users and pedestrians has risen; spending by car users and cyclists has decreased.
  • A good mix of shops and services and a quality environment are some of the most important factors in attracting visitors to town centres. If both these are poor, then changes to parking or accessibility are very unlikely to make a town centre more attractive.
  • Boroughs collect a lot of data on parking but there is less information available on town centre economic factors. Finding ways to coordinate data collection across departments could be helpful to monitor the impacts of parking policies.
  • There is very little evidence of the impacts of parking on the night time economy. This is an area that needs more research.

Given the number of local councils, lobby groups, and attention the ‘high street’ urban areas get, and the debate about free parking vs effects on the local businesses, this really solid research explores this relationship closely.

You can download the PDF of the full report from here, or read more online here

There is also a detailed appendix with data and graphical charts, providing further statistics from the research, which you can download from here



Post a Comment (0) | Trackbacks (0)

____________________________




T

 


| | | |